Aftab Khan felt helpless when he was submerged by the floodwaters A third of Pakistanhis hometown
Khan’s hometown was completely submerged. His friend rescued a woman who had walked barefoot, carrying a sick child, for 15 kilometers through stagnant floodwaters. And Khan’s mother, who now lives with him in Islamabad, was unable to get home to check if her daughter was safe on the clear roads.
“These are shocking stories, true stories,” Khan, an international climate change consultant, told CNN. “I broke my heart.”
Pakistan became the clearest example this year of how some countries are fighting for a so-called “loss and damage” fund. The concept is that countries that have contributed the most to climate change with planet-warming emissions should pay poorer countries to recover from the resulting disasters.
Earlier this year, Pakistan stewed under a deadly heat wave caused by climate change 30 times more likely, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Now it is deteriorating the worst floods in living memory
The South Asian country is responsible less than 1% among the world’s global warming emissions, but it is paying a heavy price. And there are many other countries like this around the world.
Loss and damage will be a protagonist at COP27 In Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, this year, as countries flooded or watch islands sink into the ocean, high-emitting developed countries are being asked to pay for the damage.
But there was one controversial issue year after year, because rich countries like the United States fear that agreeing to a loss and damage fund could open them up to legal liability and potential lawsuits in the future.
Climate activists from developing nations and a former top US climate official told CNN that time is running out, pointing to the disasters in Pakistan as the clearest evidence of the need for a dedicated fund for loss and damage.
The developing world is “unprepared to protect and adapt and be resilient” to climate disasters, Former White House climate advisor Gina McCarthy he told CNN. “It is the responsibility of the developed world to sustain this effort. Commitments have been made but they are not fulfilled”.
As a concept, it is a loss and damage that rich countries, which emit the most planet-warming gases, should pay for the poorer countries that are currently suffering from climate disasters that they did not create.
Loss and damage is not a new request. For the first time since 1991, developing countries and small island states, the Pacific island of Vanuatu, are asking for aid. he proposed a plan high-emitting countries to direct money to those affected by sea level rise.
It took more than a decade for the proposal to gain traction, even though Vanuatu and many other small Pacific island nations are slowly disappearing.
In Fiji, home of climate activist Lavetanalagi Seru, it has cost an average of $1 million to relocate communities due to sea level rise. Moving away from ancestral lands is not an easy decision, but the climate is changing irreversible effects on the islands, said Seru, regional policy coordinator for the Pacific Islands Climate Action Network.
“Climate change threatens the social fabric of our Pacific communities,” Seru said. “That’s why these funds are needed. It is a question of justice for many small island developing states and countries in the Pacific, for example.’
A major reason this type of fund is contentious is that rich nations worry that paying into the fund could be seen as an admission of liability, which could lead to legal battles. Developed countries like the US have pushed back in the past and are still tiptoeing around the issue.
Khan said he understands why rich developed nations are “dragging their feet”. But he added that “it is very important for them to empathize and take responsibility”.
There has also been confusion about its definition: whether loss and damage is a form of liability, compensation or even reparation.
“‘Fixes’ is not the word or the term that was used in this context,” US climate envoy John Kerry said in a call with reporters. He added: “We have always said that it is essential that the developed world helps the developing world deal with climate impacts.”
Kerry has pledged to hold talks on a fund this year before the 2024 deadline to decide what that fund will look like. And US officials are still uncertain whether it will come through an existing funding source like the Green Climate Fund, or through an entirely new source.
Kerry also sparked controversy on the issue A recent New York Times eventIn response to a question about loss and damage, Kerry suggested that no country had enough money to help places like Pakistan recover from devastating climate disasters.
“You tell me a trillion-dollar world government, that’s what it costs,” Kerry said at the event.
But others say the money is there. It’s more a matter of priority.
“Look at the annual defense budget of developed countries. We can mobilize the money,” Alden Meyer, senior member of E3G, told CNN. “It’s not about the money being there. It’s about the political will.”
At COP27, the biggest debate will be whether to create a specific financial mechanism for loss and damage, in addition to existing climate finance to help countries adapt to climate change and transition to clean energy.
After climate-affected nations called for a new facility to finance losses and damages last year at COP26 in Glasgow, is likely to be the official COP27 agenda this year. But while wealthier countries like the US and the EU have pledged to talk about it, there is little hope of a fund that countries will pull out of Sharm.
“Do we expect to have a fund by the end of two weeks? I hope he would like it, but we will see how the parties comply with it”, said the Egyptian ambassador Mohamed Nasr, the country’s chief climate negotiator, recently.
But Nasr also dashed hopes, saying that if countries are still debating whether to put loss and damage on the agenda, they are unlikely to make progress on a financing mechanism.
He said the loss and damage talks were likely to continue during the two weeks in Sharm, possibly finalizing a framework for a funding mechanism, or clarifying whether funds could come from new or existing sources.
Some officials from climate-affected nations warned that if countries don’t reach an agreement now, the problem will be much worse later.
“For countries that aren’t on the front lines, they think it’s kind of a distraction and people should focus on mitigation,” Avinash Persaud, special envoy to Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, told CNN. “If we had done the mitigation early enough, we wouldn’t have had to adapt and if we had adapted early enough, we wouldn’t have suffered. But we didn’t do those things.”
Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated how much money has been spent on relocating communities in Fiji due to sea level rise. That’s an average of $1 million per community, according to Lavetanalagi Seru.